IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF AUTOPHAGY MARKERS IN THE HUMAN HIPPOCAMPUS DURING AGING AND ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE
https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2026.34(2).1021
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Autophagy is a key mechanism for the removal of damaged organelles in neurons, and its dysfunction underlies aging and the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. However, the specific features of the autophagic response in different hippocampal regions that ex-hibit selective vulnerability in Alzheimer's disease remain poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate autophagy markers in neurons of the CA1 and CA2 zones of the human hippocampus during physiological aging and Alzheimer's disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The work was performed on autopsy material from young patients (35-45 years old, n=20), elderly patients without neurodegenerative pathology (>85 years old, n=20), and patients with Alzheimer's disease (Braak stage 3-4, >85 years old, n=15). Markers of ubiquitin, pS65-Ub, TOMM20, SQSTM1/p62, Beclin-1, LC3b, and LAMP2 were determined immunohistochemically, and staining intensity in the neuronal perikarya was assessed.
RESULTS. It was found that, with age, compensatory activation of autophagy markers is absent in the CA1 zone against the background of accumulation of the adapter protein p62, whereas in the CA2 zone, an in-crease in Beclin-1 and LAMP2 is observed with a decrease in the number of mature autophagosomes (LC3b). In Alzheimer's disease, a decrease in the number of initiation complexes containing Beclin-1 and accumula-tion of autophagosomes (LC3b) are observed in both zones; however, in the CA2 zone, a decrease in the amounts of LAMP2 and p62 is additionally recorded, indicating a block in the terminal stages of autophagy.
CONCLUSION. The obtained data indicate pronounced zonal heterogeneity of the autophagic response in the hippocampus both during aging and in Alzheimer's disease. The identified differences in the autophagy pro-cess in the CA1 and CA2 zones confirm the need for a differentiated approach to the selection of targeted drugs for the treatment of neurodegenerative changes.
About the Authors
V. S. SukhorukovRussian Federation
Vladimir S. Sukhorukov, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
T. I. Baranich
Russian Federation
Tat′yana I. Baranich, Candidate of Medical Sciences
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
О. V. Velts
Russian Federation
Ol′ga V. Vel′ts
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
K. M. Okulova
Russian Federation
Kseniya M. Okulova
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
D. N. Voronkov
Russian Federation
Dmitriy N. Voronkov, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
A. V. Egorova
Russian Federation
Anna V. Yegorova, Researcherin
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
E. V Shcherbak
Russian Federation
Yekaterina V. Shcherbak
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
V. V. Glinkina
Russian Federation
Valeriya V. Glinkina, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
References
1. Stavoe AKH, Holzbaur ELF. Autophagy in Neurons. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2019;35:477–500. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125242
2. Sidibe DK, Vogel MC, Maday S. Organization of the autophagy pathway in neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2022;75:102554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2022.102554
3. Yang L, Yang H, Zhang M, Zhang F, Liu X, Zhang Z, Wang J, Chen X, Wang Y, Zhang R, Li W. The role of TOMM20 in Mediating TERT translocation to mitochondria and its impact on mitophagy in membranous nephropathy. BMC Nephrol. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-04910-4
4. Nixon RA. Autophagy-lysosomal-associated neuronal death in neurodegenerative disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2024;148(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-024-02799-7
5. Palmer JE, Wilson N, Son SM, Obrocki P, Wrobel L, Rob M, Takla M, Korolchuk VI, Rubinsztein DC. Autophagy, aging, and age-related neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2025;113(1):29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.015
6. Kiriyama Y, Nochi H. The Function of Autophagy in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(11):26797–812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161125990
7. Lee YK, Lee JA. Role of the mammalian ATG8/LC3 family in autophagy: differential and compensatory roles in the spatiotem-poral regulation of autophagy. BMB Rep. 201;49(8):424–30. https://doi.org/10.5483/bmbrep.2016.49.8.081
8. Shilovsky GA. [p62: Intersection of Antioxidant Defense and Autophagy Pathways]. Mol Biol (Mosk). 2024 Sep-Oct;58(5):703–718. Russian. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0026898424050036
9. Rubio-Tomás T, Sotiriou A, Tavernarakis N. The interplay between selective types of (macro)autophagy: Mitophagy and xe-nophagy. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2023;374:129–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ircmb.2022.10.003
10. Eskelinen EL. Roles of LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 in lysosome biogenesis and autophagy. Mol Aspects Med. 2006;27(5-6):495–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2006.08.005
11. Duan Y, Han C, Zheng H, Yu J, Luo M. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias from 1990 to 2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Front Aging Neurosci. 2025;17:1678212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1678212
12. Twiss E, McPherson C, Weaver DF. Global Diseases Deserve Global Solutions: Alzheimer's Disease. Neurol Int. 2025 Jun 14;17(6):92. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/neurolint17060092
13. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308809
14. Fjell AM, McEvoy L, Holland D, Dale AM, Walhovd KB. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. What is normal in normal aging? Effects of aging, amyloid and Alzheimer's disease on the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;117:20–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.02.004
15. Ye R, Goodheart AE, Locascio JJ, Peterec E, Properzi M, Thibault EG, Chuba E, Johnson KA, Brickhouse MJ, Touroutoglou A, Growdon JH, Dickerson BC, Gomperts SN. Differential Vulnerability of Hippocampal Subfields to Amyloid and Tau Deposition in the Lewy Body Diseases. Neurology. 2024;102(12):e209460. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000209460
16. Antharam V, Collingwood JF, Bullivant JP, Davidson MR, Chandra S, Mikhaylova A, Finnegan ME, Batich C, Forder JR, Dobson J. High field magnetic resonance microscopy of the human hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease: quantitative imaging and correla-tion with iron. Neuroimage. 2012;59(2):1249–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.019
17. Adler DH, Wisse LEM, Ittyerah R, Pluta JB, Ding SL, Xie L, Wang J, Kadivar S, Robinson JL, Schuck T, Trojanowski JQ, Grossman M, Detre JA, Elliott MA, Toledo JB, Liu W, Pickup S, Miller MI, Das SR, Wolk DA, Yushkevich PA. Characterizing the human hip-pocampus in aging and Alzheimer's disease using a computational atlas derived from ex vivo MRI and histology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(16):4252–4257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801093115
18. Zhao F, Behnisch T. The Enigmatic CA2: Exploring the Understudied Region of the Hippocampus and Its Involvement in Parkin-son's Disease. Biomedicines. 2023 Jul 14;11(7):1996. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11071996
19. Tzakis N, Holahan MR. Social Memory and the Role of the Hippocampal CA2 Region. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;13:233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00233
20. Correa J, Sablani S, Wasfi M, Correa C, Bandelow S. Age dependent seizure susceptibility of CA2 hippocampal neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2025;19:1715872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2025.1715872
21. Oliva A, Fernandez-Ruiz A, Karaba LA. CA2 orchestrates hippocampal network dynamics. Hippocampus. 2023;33(3):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.23495
22. Rey CC, Robert V, Bouisset G, Loisy M, Lopez S, Cattaud V, Lejards C, Piskorowski RA, Rampon C, Chevaleyre V, Verret L. Al-tered inhibitory function in hippocampal CA2 contributes in social memory deficits in Alzheimer's mouse model. iScience. 2022;25(3):103895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103895
23. Bordi M, Berg MJ, Mohan PS, Peterhoff CM, Alldred MJ, Che S, Ginsberg SD, Nixon RA. Autophagy flux in CA1 neurons of Alz-heimer hippocampus: Increased induction overburdens failing lysosomes to propel neuritic dystrophy. Autophagy. 2016;12(12):2467–2483. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2016.1239003
24. Sukhorukov VS, Yegorova AV, Romanenko AS, Ryabova MS, Krasil`nikova AP. Mitofagiya pri vozrast-zavisimoy neyrogeneratsii. ACTA NATURAE. 2025;17,4(67). https://doi.org/10.32607/actanaturae. In Russian
25. Dou C, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Qin C. Autophagy and autophagy-related molecules in neurodegenerative diseases. Animal Model Exp Med. 2023;6(1):10–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ame2.12229
26. Shan W, Liu Y, Tang R, Li H, Yang H, Lin L. Targeting mitochondrial autophagy for anti-aging. Cell Death Discov. 2025 Dec;12(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-025-02913-y
27. Marino A, Di Fraia D, Panfilova D, Sahu AK, Minetti A, Omrani O, Cirri E, Ori A. Aging and diet alter the protein ubiquitylation landscape in the mouse brain. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):5266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60542-6
28. Kim Y, Ha TY, Lee MS, Chang KA. Regulatory Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications of Lysosomal Dysfunction in Alzhei-mer's Disease. Int J Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 13;21(3):1014–1031. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.103028
29. Papadopoulos C, Kravic B, Meyer H. Repair or Lysophagy: Dealing with Damaged Lysosomes. J Mol Biol. 2020;432(1):231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.08.010
30. Salminen A, Kaarniranta K, Kauppinen A, Ojala J, Haapasalo A, Soininen H, Hiltunen M. Impaired autophagy and APP pro-cessing in Alzheimer's disease: The potential role of Beclin 1 interactome. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;106–107:33–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.002
31. Chu CT, Zhu J, Dagda R. Beclin 1-independent pathway of damage-induced mitophagy and autophagic stress: implications for neurodegeneration and cell death. Autophagy. 2007;3(6):663–6. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.4625
Review
For citations:
Sukhorukov V.S., Baranich T.I., Velts О.V., Okulova K.M., Voronkov D.N., Egorova A.V., Shcherbak E.V., Glinkina V.V. IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF AUTOPHAGY MARKERS IN THE HUMAN HIPPOCAMPUS DURING AGING AND ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE. Morphological newsletter. 2026;34(2):28-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2026.34(2).1021
JATS XML




































