Anatomical and anthropological aspects of the variability of phallometrical indicators of healthy men
https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2016.24(2):52-59
Abstract
The area of the application and use of knowledge about the genitometry of healthy people are in many areas related to the fundamental problems of anthropology and human anatomy, the study and understanding of human nature, the based on biological differences of social and gender roles, gender identity problems, psychology, human culture and history. Theoretical and practical importance of the study of phallometrical indicators of men are to their importance for clinical medicine, andrology, reproductive medicine, urology, sexology and forensic medicine. The purpose of the study - reviewing of available russian and foreign scientific sources on phallometry of healthy men in terms of social and biological factors which causing their variability, the anatomical and anthropological aspects of its study. Shown the oneness and nonsystematic research on the russian groups in contrast to the foreign studies, including a meta-analytical studies and the development of nomograms. It is shown that the studies in different ethnic and regional populations may help in solving the problems associated with subjective and objective causes of men’s dysmorphophobia and the need for a comprehensive study them.
About the Authors
D. A. Tikhonov
ГУЗ Городская поликлиника № 5 г. Ульяновска Министерства здравоохранения Ульяновской области
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. M. Khayrullin
ФГБОУ ВО «Ульяновский государственный университет» Министерства образования и науки РФ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Раштон Дж. Филипп. Раса, эволюция, поведение. Взгляд с позиции жизненного цикла/ Пер. с англ. Д.О. Румянцева. - М.: Профит Стайл, 2011.-416с.
2. Kim W.W. History and Cultural Perspective/ In Book: Penile Augmentation. Eds: N.Ch. Park, S.W. Kim, D.G. Moon.- Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2016.- P. 11-31.
3. Гайворонский И.В., Мазуренко Р.Г. Вариантная анатомия венозного русла полового члена взрослого человека//Морфология.- 2012.- Т. 141.- № 1.- С. 47-51.
4. Горбунов Н.С., Прохоренков В.И., Самотесов П.А., Андрейчиков А.В., Помилуйкова Е.О. Половой член: морфологическая предрасположенность эректильных дисфункций/ Н.С. Горбунов и др.- М.: Медицинская книга, Н. Новгород: Изд-во НГМА, 2004.- 137с.
5. Azadzoi K.M., Vlachiotis J., Pontari M., Siroky M.B. Hemodynamics of penile erection: III. Measurement of deep intracavernosal and subtunical blood flow and oxygen tension// Journal of Urology. - 1995.- Vol. 153.- № 2.- P. 521-526.
6. Chen J., Gefen A., Greenstein A., Matzkin H., Elad D. Predicting penile size during erection// International Journal of Impotence Research.- 2000.-Vol. 12.- Issue 6.- P. 328-333.
7. Mondaini N., Ponchietti R., Gontero P., Muir G.H., et al. Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures// International Journal of Impotence Research. - 2002.- Vol. 14.- Issue 4.- P. 283-286.
8. Colombo F., Casarico A. Penile enlargement// Current Opinion in Urology.- 2008.- Vol. 18.- №6.- P. 583-588.
9. Dillon B.E., Chama N.B. and Honig S.C. Penile size and penile enlargement surgery: a review// International Journal of Impotence Research.- 2008.-Vol. 20.- P. 519-529.
10. Mondaini N., Gontero P. Idiopathic short penis: myth or reality?// Brit. J. Urol. Int.- 2005.- Vol. 95.-Issue 1.- P. 8-9.
11. Park N.Ch., Kim S.W., Moon D.G. Penile Augmentation. - Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2016.- 271pp.
12. Robertson A. World’s first penis REDUCTION surgery: Teenager requested op after his manhood grew so large it stopped him having sex// Daily Mail. -2015; February, 12// URL: http://www.dailymail. co.uk/health/article-2950409/World-s-penis-REDUCTION-surgery-Teenager-requested-op-genitals-grew-large-stopped-having-sex.html Дата обращения 01.01.2016
13. Benson J.S., Abern M.R., Levine L.A. Penile shortening after radical prostatectomy and Peyronie’s surgery// Current Urology Reports.- 2009.- Vol. 10.-P 468-474.
14. Haliloglu A., Baltaci S., Yaman O. Penile length changes in men treated with androgen suppression plus radiation therapy for local or locally advanced prostate cancer// Journal of Urology.- 2007.- Vol. 177.- P. 128-130.
15. Savoie M., Kim S.S., Soloway M.S. A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer// Journal of Urology.- 2003.- Vol. 169.- P. 1462-1464.
16. Campbell M.F., Wein A.J., Kavoussi L.R. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Editor-in-chief Alan J. Wein; Louis R. Kavoussi, et al. 9th Ed.- W.B. Saunders: Philadelphia, 2007.- P. 3751-3754.
17. Белоусов И.И., Коган М.И., Ибишев Х.С., Воробьев Х.С., Хрипун И.А., Гусова З.Р. Размеры полового члена при сахарном диабете 2 типа// Урология.- 2015.- № 6.- С. 82-86.
18. Awwad Z., Abu-Hijleh M., Basri S., Shegam N., Murshidi M., Ajlouni K. Penile measurements in normal adult Jordanians and in patients with erectile dysfunction// International Journal of Impotence Research.- 2005.- Vol. 17.- № 2.- P. 191-195.
19. Lynn R. An examination of Rushton’s theory of differences in penis length and circumference and r-K life history theory in 113 populations// Personality and Individual Differences.- 2013.- Vol. 55.- Issue 3.- P. 261-266.
20. Veale D., Miles S., Bramley S., Muir G., and Hodsoll J. Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15 521 men// BJUInternational.-2015.- Vol. 115.-№6.- P. 978-986.
21. Khaǐrullin R. Segmental 2:4 digit ratio. Unilateral, bilateral and hand-type differences in men//HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology. - 2011.- Т. 62.- № 6.- С. 478-486.
22. Хайруллин Р.М., Филиппова Е.Н., Бутов А.А., Кастерина А.В., Хайруллин Ф.Р., Зеркалова Ю.Ф. Линейные зависимости значений пальцевого (2d:4d) индекса у лиц мужского пола// Вестник Московского университета. Серия 23: Антропология.- 2011.- № 2.- С. 16-24.
23. Васильев И.В., Корякин М.В., Акопян А.С. Корреляционный анализ размеров полового члена // Российские морфологические ведомости.- 1998.-№ 1-2.- С. 35-39.
24. Дмитриева О.А., Громашева О.С. Программа «control» для определения возможности полового акта без нарушения целости девственной плевы// Судебно-медицинская экспертиза, 2004.- № 2.-С.21-23.
25. Хайруллин P.M., Тихонов Д.А., Мирин А.А., Свитайло М.П. Анатомо-антропологические показатели физического развития и репродуктивного здоровья юношей// Морфология. - 2009.- Т. 136.- № 4.- С. 146a.
26. Тихонов Д.А., Хайруллин Р.М., Мирин А.А. Корреляции размеров полового члена юношей и молодых мужчин с составом тела и уровнем общего тестостерона крови// Морфологические ведомости. - 2011.- № 1.- С. 8-64.
27. Schon feld W.A., Beebe, G.W. Normal growth and variations in the male genitalia from birth to maturity// Journal of Urology.- 1942.- Vol. 48.- P. 759-777.
28. Kinsey A.G., Pomeroy W.B., Martin C.E. Sexual behavior in the human male. - Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1948.- 809pp.
29. Bondil P., Costa P., Daures J.P., Louis J.F., Navratil H. Clinical study of the longitudinal deformation of the flaccid penis and of its variations with aging// European Urology.- 1992.- Vol. 21.- P. 284-286.
30. Da Ros C. Caucasian penis: what is the normal size?//Journal of Urology. - 1994.- Vol. 151.- P. 323A.
31. Wessells H., Lue T.F., McAninch J.W. Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation //Journal of Urology. -1996.- Vol. 156.-Issue 3.- P. 995-997.
32. Ponchietti R., Mondaini N., Bonafe M., Di Loro F., Biscioni S., Masieri L. Penile length and circumference: a study on 3,300young Italian males// European Urology. - 2001.- Vol. 39.- P. 183-186.
33. Son H., Lee H., Huh J-S., Kim S.W., Paick J-S. Studies on self-esteem of penile size in young Korean military men// Asian Journal Andrology.- 2003.- № 5.-P. 185-189.
34. Promodu K., Shanmughadas K.V., Bhat S. and Nair K.R. Penile length and circumference: an Indian study// International Journal of Impotence Research.- 2007.- Vol. 19.- № 6.- P. 558-563.
35. Ajmani M.L., Jain S.P., Saxena S.K. Anthropometric study of male external genitalia of 320 healthy Nigerian adults// Anthropologischer Anzeiger.-1985.- Vol. 43.- № 2.- P. 179-186.
36. Schneider T., Sperling H., Lummen G., Syllwasschy J., Rubben H. Does penile size in younger men cause problems in condom use? A prospective measurement of penile dimensions in 111 young and 32 older men// Urology.- 2001.- Vol. 57.- P. 314-318.
37. Smith A.M., Jolley D., Hocking J., Benton K., Gerofi J. Does penis size influence condom slippage and breakage?// International Journal of Impotence Research.- 2005.- Vol.-17.- № 2.- P. 191-195.
38. Bogaert A.F., Hershberger S. The relation between sexual orientation and penile size//Archive Sexual Behavior. - 1999.- Vol. 28.- P. 213-221.
39. Grov C., Wells B.E., Parsons J.T. Self-reported penis size and experiences with condoms among gay and bisexual men//Archives of Sexual Behavior.-2013.- Vol. 42.- № 2.- P. 313-322.
40. Harding R. et Golombok S.E. Test-retest reliability of the measurement of penile dimensions in a sample of gay men//Archives of Sexual Behavior.- 2002.- Vol. 31.- № 4.- P. 351-357.
41. Seo J.T., Choe J.H. Patient Selection and Counseling/ In Book: Penile Augmentation. Eds: N.Ch. Park, S.W. Kim, D.G. Moon.- Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2016.- P. 33-40.
Review
For citations:
Tikhonov D.A., Khayrullin R.M. Anatomical and anthropological aspects of the variability of phallometrical indicators of healthy men. Morphological newsletter. 2016;24(2):52-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2016.24(2):52-59
Views:
413
