ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ПОЛОВЫХ РАЗЛИЧИЙ ПЯСТИ РУК ЧЕЛОВЕКА МЕТОДОМ ГЕОМЕТРИЧЕСКОЙ МОРФОМЕТРИИ
Аннотация
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
Александр Сергеевич ЕрмоленкоРоссия
Елена Николаевна Филиппова
Россия
Радик Магзинурович Хайруллин
Россия
Фархад Радикович Хайруллин
Россия
Список литературы
1. Andreev I.D. O nekotoryh osnovnyh principah arhitektury skeleta kisti cheloveka// Voprosy antropologii.- 1962.- Vyp. 12.-S. 3-14.
2. Weissenberg S. Ueber die Formen der Hand und des Fusses. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie. 1895;27:82-111.
3. Astanin L.P. Skeletkisti primatovi cheloveka.-Diss. dokt. biol. nauk.- Leningrad, 1950.-418 s.
4. Danilova E.I. Prisposobitel’naja jevoljucija kisti primatov v svjazi s proishozhdeniem cheloveka. - Diss. dokt. biol. nauk. - Kiev, 1964.- 287 s.
5. Mashkara K.I. Vlijanie truda i sporta na stroenie skeleta kisti.-Diss. dokt. med. nauk.-Leningrad, 1966.- 299 s.
6. Rigonen V.l. Rost i razvitie korotkih trubchatyh kostej kisti u zhitelej Respubliki Karelija.-Diss. kand. med. nauk. - SPb., 1998.-152 s.
7. Bookstein F.L. «Size and shape»: a comment on semantics. Syst. Zool. Vol. 1989; 38(2):173-180.
8. Pavlinov I.Ja., Mikeshina N.G. Principy i metody geometricheskoj morfometrii// Zhurnal obshhej biologii.- 2002.- T. 63.- № 6.- S. 473-493.
9. Thorpe R.S. Biometric analysis of geographic variation and racial affinities. Biol. Rev. 1976; 51:407-452.
10. Atchley W.R., Rutledge J.J., Cowley D.E. Genetic components of size and shape. 2. Multivariate covariance patterns in the rat and mouse skull. Evolution. 1981; 35(6):1037-1055.
11. Flitrv B. Common principal components and related multivariate models. NY: Wiley, 1988. 258 p.
12. Adams D.C., Rohlf F.J., Slice D. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following he «revolution». Italian Journal of Zoology. 2004; 71:5-16.
13. Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology. 1990; 39(1):40-59.
14. Slice D.E. Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. NY: Kluwer academic / Premium publisher, 2005; XXII. 384 p.
15. Thompson D.W. On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 1961. 360 p.
16. Sneat P.H.A., Sokal R.R. Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman, 1973. 573 p.
17. Bookstein F.L. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991. 198 p.
18. Rohlf F.J., Marcus L. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 1993; 8(4):129-132.
19. Dryden I.L., Mardia K.V. Statistical Shape Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley&Sons Ltd, 1998. 376 p.
20. Zelditch M.L., Swiderski D.L., Sheets H.D. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2004. 416 p.
21. Rohlf F.J. TpsDig, Version 1.23. NY: State Univ at Stony Brook, 2001. URL: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ morph. 29/01/2015
22. Rohlf F.J. TpsSuper, version 2.0. NY: State Univ at Stony Brook, 2013. URL: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ morph. 29/01/2015
23. Rohlf F.J. TPSrelw: relative warps, version 1.23. NY: State Univ at Stony Brook, 2001. URL:http://life. bio.sunysb.edu/morph. 29/01/2015
24. Pavlinov IIa. Geometric morphometrics of the skull of various murid rodents ( Mammalia, Rodentia): relation of the skull shape to the trophic specialization. Zh. Obshch. Biol. 2000; 61(6):583-600.
25. Rohlf F.J. TPSregr, version 1.23. NY: State Univat Stony Brook, 1998. URL: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ morph. 29/01/2015
26. Rohlf F.J. TPSsplin: thin plate spline, version 1.2. NY: State Univ at Stony Brook, 2004. URL:http://life. bio.sunysb.edu/morph. 29/01/2015
27. Goodall C.R. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shapes. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 1991; 53:285-339.
28. Small C. The statistical theory of shape. NY: Springer, 1996. 227 p.
29. Rohlf F.J. et al. Morphometric spaces, shape components and the effect of linear transformations. In book: Advances in morphometrics. NY; L: Plenum Press, 1996. P. 131-152.
30. Costa L.D.F., Cesar R.M. Shape analysis and classification: theory and practice. Chicago: CRC Press, 2000. 659 p.
31. McCown T.D., Keith A. The Fossil Human Remains from the Levalloiso-Mousterian. In 2 vol. Vol. 2: The Stone Age of Mount Carmel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939. 390 p.
32. Sanfilippo P.G., Hewitt A.W., Mountain J.A., Mackey D.A. A Geometric Morphometric Assessment of Hand Shape and Comparison to the 2D:4D Digit Ratio as a Marker of Sexual Dimorphism. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2013; 16(2):590-600.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Ермоленко А.С., Филиппова Е.Н., Хайруллин Р.М., Хайруллин Ф.Р. ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ПОЛОВЫХ РАЗЛИЧИЙ ПЯСТИ РУК ЧЕЛОВЕКА МЕТОДОМ ГЕОМЕТРИЧЕСКОЙ МОРФОМЕТРИИ. Морфологические ведомости. 2015;23(1):43-48. https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2015.0(1):43-48
For citation:
Ermolenko A.S., Filippova E.N., Khayrullin R.M., Khayrullin F.R. THE STUDY OF SEXUAL DIFFERENCES OF METACARPUS OF THE HUMAN HAND BY METHOD OF GEOMETRICAL MORPHOMETRY. Morphological newsletter. 2015;23(1):43-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2015.0(1):43-48