TOPICAL ISSUES OF THE ANATOMY OF BONE JUNCTIONS TEACHING
https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2023.31(1).706
Abstract
The educational topic «General anatomy of bone joints» of human anatomy in medical universities, which is key to understanding arthrology and syndesmology, is quite difficult for students to master due to serious discrepancies in the description of this section by the authors of textbooks and manuals which written on Russian Language and English Language. The purpose of this study is to compare the interpretation of the general data on bone joints of Russian-speaking and English-speaking anatomical schools in order to determine the basic differences in approaches to their study, which should be taken into account when teaching this topic to medical students. The texts of textbooks and manuals on human anatomy for students of medical universities in Russian and English served as materials for the study. Differences in approaches to the description of bone joints and in the interpretation of their main characteristics are revealed. Most Russian textbooks do not indicate exactly what type of connective tissue fibrous compounds are formed, it is not clear whether all fibrous compounds should be considered syndesmoses, or whether these are only ligaments and membranes. Classifying some joints as both complex and combined contradicts the principle of classification according to mutually exclusive features. As for the English-language educational literature, the English word «joint» is not a synonym for the Russian word «articulation» i.e. «connection between bones» and can mean any type of connection in general, in contrast to its Russian counterpart, which has a specific meaning, synonymous with the phrase «synovial connection». When describing the articular surfaces, the verbal construct «articular surfaces» is not used, only the structures that make up the joint are described. Flat joints are called «gliding joint», the movement described in them is called gliding. All these discrepancies and contradictions introduce a significant amount of misunderstanding in the course of studying the relevant topics by students, require explanations for the approaches to describing and classifying bone joints, their revision in order to increase the efficiency of studying the relevant sections and the unambiguity of their interpretation.
About the Authors
Anna A. KolokolovaRussian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Human Anatomy
Competing Interests:
The author declares that she have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
Elena S. Chernomortseva
Russian Federation
Docent, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Human Anatomy
Competing Interests:
The author declares that she have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
Mariya O. Slobodina
Russian Federation
Studentin
Competing Interests:
The author declares that she have no conflicts of interest in the planning, implementation, financing and use of the results of this study
References
1. Valker FI, Vishnevskiy AS, Grigorovich KA i dr. Kratkiy kurs operativnoy khirurgii s topograficheskoy anatomiey. Pod redaktsiey VN Shevkunenko.- Leningrad: MEDGIS, 1951.- 796s. In Russian
2. Guyvoronsky IV, Nichuporuk GI, Guyvoronsky AI. Anatomiya cheloveka: uchebnick v 2 t. T. 1.- Moskva: GEOTAR-Media, 2014.- 688s. In Russian
3. Gusev AS, Sergeev YuP. Anatomiya.- Moskva: Meditsina, 1966.- 311s. In Russian
4. Kapandyi AI. Pozvonochnik. Fiziologiya sustavov.- Moskva: Eksmo, 2014.- 344s. In Russian
5. Mikhaylov SS, Chukbar AV, Tsibul’kin AG. Anatomiya cheloveka; uchebnick v 2 t. T. 1.- Moskva: GEOTAR-Media, 2011.- 608s. In Russian
6. Ostroverkhov GE, Bomash YuM, Lubotskiy DN. Operativnaya khirurgiya i topograficheskaya anatomiya: uchebnik dlya studentov meditsinskikh vuzov.- Moskva: OOO «Meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo», 2015.- 736s. In Russian
7. Pivchenko PG, Trushel NA, Kovaleva DV. Anatomiya oporno-dvigatelnogo apparata.- Minsk: BGMU, 2011.- 147s. In Russian
8. Prives MG, Lisenkov NK, Bushkovich VI. Anatomiya cheloveka: uchebnaya literatura dlya studentov meditsinskikh vuzov.- S-Pb: Izdatelsky dom SPbMAPO, 2011.- 720s. In Russian
9. Sapin MR, Bilich GL. Anatomiya cheloveka: uchebnik dlya studentov meditsinskikh vuzov v 2 t. T.1.- Moskva: ООО «Izdatelsky dom «ONIKS 21 vek», 2009.- 463s. In Russian
10. Sinel’nikov RD, Sinel’nikov YaR, Sinel’nikov AYa. Atlas anatomii cheloveka: uchebnoe posobie v 4 t. T. 1.- Moskva: Izdatelstvo Novaya volna, 2018.- 248s. In Russian
11. Tonkov VN. Uchebnik normalnoy anatomii cheloveka.- Leningrad: Medgiz, 1962.- 763s. In Russian
12. Ellis H. Ellis' Clinical Anatomy for Medical Students.- Wiley India Pvt. Limited, 2015. 276 p.
13. Gray H. Gray’s Anatomy. Forty-first edition.- N-Y: Elsevier Limited, 2016.- 1600pp
14. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically oriented anatomy.- London: Walter Kluwer Health, 2009.- 1168pp
15. Snell RS. Clinical Anatomy: An Illustrated Review with Questions and Explanations.- London: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, 2004.- 305pp
16. Sobotta SJ. Atlas of Human Anatomy.- N-Y: Elsevier Urban&Fischer, 2011.- 384pp
17. Klassifikatsiya. Electronny resurs. In Russian. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klassifikatsiya. Data obrashcheniya 17.04.2022
Supplementary files
On the ground of a comparison of classifications and general information available in Russian- and English-language anatomy textbooks, the authors identified the main differences in approaches to the study of bone junctions that should be taken into account when teach human anatomy of medical students
Review
For citations:
Kolokolova A.A., Chernomortseva E.S., Slobodina M.O. TOPICAL ISSUES OF THE ANATOMY OF BONE JUNCTIONS TEACHING. Morphological newsletter. 2023;31(1):67-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2023.31(1).706