FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION AND INTERTISSUE INTERACTIONS OF THE MAXILLARY SINUS ANTERIOR WALL MUCOUS MEMBRANE AND ITS PERIOSTEUM
https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2024.32(1).857
Abstract
Studying the structure of the mucoperiosteum of the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus is of great clinical importance for otolaryngologists, dentists and maxillofacial surgeons. From clinical practice, it is well known about the frequent trauma of the muperiosteum and its weak regenerative potential, but there is no understanding of the basic mechanisms underlying them. This is explained by the lack of complete information about the structural organization of the periosteum from the side of the maxillary sinus and the presence of connections in the composition between the mucous membrane and the periosteal structure. Purpose of the study: to identify the features of the structural organization and intertissue interactions of the mucoperiosteum of the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. The study analyzed tissue samples from 10 male patients of the second middle age, 38-56 years old, who underwent surgery to remove foreign bodies from the maxillary sinuses using access through the oral cavity. Fragments of the mucous membrane (Schneider's membrane) were taken from the inner surface of the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. A histological examination of preparations with hematoxylin and eosin and Van Gieson stains was carried out, and their general morphometry was performed. As a result of the study, it was established that the periosteum of Schneider's membrane lacks the inner layer and blood vessels. It is a thin single bundle of collagen fibers, which in some areas is connected through perpendicular collagen fibers to the lamina propria of the mucous membrane. Based on its location in the bone, functional features, and structural features, the periosteum of the Schneiderian membrane can be regarded as a tissue version of the endosteum. A study of the mucoperiosteum of the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus showed that it consists of a layer of respiratory epithelium and a layer of loose fibrous connective tissue; the boundary of this membrane is a single horizontal plate of a compacted bundle of collagen fibers adjacent to the bone. The presence of sections of cross-links between the lamina propria of the mucous membrane and the horizontal compacted bundle of collagen fibers allows us to consider them a single structural and functional complex.
About the Authors
Nikolay V. VolovRussian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Docent, Senior Researcher
Competing Interests:
The Author declares that he did have no conflicts of interest in planning, implementing, financing and using the results of this study
Yulia V. Grigorieva
Russian Federation
Docent, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Histology and Embryology
Competing Interests:
The Author declares that she did have no conflicts of interest in planning, implementing, financing and using the results of this study
Sergey N. Yukhimets
United Republic of Tanzania
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Human Anatomy
Competing Interests:
The Author declares that he did have no conflicts of interest in planning, implementing, financing and using the results of this study
Irina F. Nefyodova
Russian Federation
Chief Specialist
Competing Interests:
The Author declares that she did have no conflicts of interest in planning, implementing, financing and using the results of this study
References
1. Glück U. Die physiologische Bedeutung der Nasennebenhöhlen beim Menschen: Spekulationen seit 1800 Jahren. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1991;121(25):925-931
2. Zollikofer CP, Weissmann JD. A morphogenetic model of cranial pneumatization based on the invasive tissue hypothesis. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008;291(11):1446-1454. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20784
3. Shcherbakov DA, Ekimova AE, Simonov AV. Zakonomernosti razvitiya verkhnechelyustnoy pazukhi. Universitetskaya meditsina Urala. 2019;4(19):46-49. In Russian
4. Preuschoft H, Witte H, Witzel U. Pneumatized spaces, sinuses and spongy bones in the skulls of primates. Anthropol Anz. 2002;60(1):67-79
5. Baydik OD, Logvinov SV, Zubarev SG i dr. Stroeniye slizistoy obolochki verkhnechelyustnoy pazukhi v norme i pri odontogennykh perforativnykh sinusitakh. Morfologiya. 2011;139(2):49-54. In Russian
6. Takasu T, Ito H. Electron microscopic study of the epithelial cell of the mucosa of the maxillary sinus. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1969;72(2):488-489. In Japanese
7. Kavuzlu A, Tatar EÇ, Karagöz T et al. The effects of the stem cell on ciliary regeneration of injured rabbit sinonasal epithelium. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(8):3057-3064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4595-7
8. Pokrovskaya EM, Krasnozhen VN, Polishchuk SA, Tsyplakov DZ. Sravnitel’noe issledovanie gistologicheskogo stroeniya slizistoy obolochki v norme, pri kistoznom porazhenii okolonosovykh pazukh i khronicheskom sinusite. Prakticheskaya meditsina.2023;21(2):58-62. In Russian
9. Monje A, Diaz KT, Aranda L et al. Schneiderian Membrane Thickness and Clinical Implications for Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analyses. J Periodontol. 2016;87(8):888-899. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160041
10. Kim DM, Nevins M, Camelo M et al. Human histologic evaluation of the use of the dental putty for bone formation in the maxillary sinus: case series. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38(4):391-398. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-11-00069
11. Ballon A, Landes CA, Zeilhofer HF et al. The importance of the primary reconstruction of the traumatized anterior maxillary sinus wall. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19(2):505-509. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e318163f2ea
12. Tomazic PV, Sommer F, Treccosti A et al. 3D endoscopy shows enhanced anatomical details and depth perception vs 2D: a multicentre study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(7):2321-2326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06495-6
13. Hirata Y, Kino K, Nagaoka S et al. A clinical investigation of oro-maxillary sinus-perforation due to tooth extraction. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2001;68(3):249-253. In Japanese. https://doi.org/10.5357/koubyou.68.249
14. Vishnyakov VV, Panin AM, Kharlamov AA. Rol’ patologii vnutrinosovykh struktur v razvitii oslozhneniy operatsii sinusliftinga. Rossiyskaya rinologiya. 2010;18(3):23-24. In Russian
15. Zubareva AA, Karpishchenko SA, Shavgulidze MA. Kliniko-luchevye osobennosti smeshannykh polipoznoy i polipozno-gnoynoy form khronicheskikh rinosinusitov v sochetanii s zubochelyustnoy patologiey. Consilium Medicum. 2021;23(3): 216-221. In Russian
16. Boyko NV. Kisty verkhnechelyustnoy pazukhi. Rossiyskaya rinologiya. 2019;27(4):204-208. In Russian
17. Khalitov RR, Krasnozhen VN, Shcherbakov DA, Tsyplakov DE. Nekotoryye patomorfologicheskie aspekty retentsionnoy kisty verkhnechelyustnoy pazukhi. Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2020; 26(4):11-18
18. Tonna EA, Cronkite EP. Autoradiographic studies of cell proliferation in the periosteum of intact and fractured femora of mice utilizing DNA labeling with H3-thymidine. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1961;107:719-21. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-107-26733
19. Hauge EM, Qvesel D, Eriksen EF et al. Cancellous bone remodeling occurs in specialized compartments lined by cells expressing osteoblastic markers. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(9):1575-82. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.9.1575
20. Arai F, Yoshihara H, Hosokawa K et al. Niche regulation of hematopoietic stem cells in the endosteum. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1176:36-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04561.x
21. Taichman RS, Emerson SG. Human osteoblasts support hematopoiesis through the production of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J Exp Med. 1994 May 1;179(5):1677-1682. https://doi.org//10.1084/jem.179.5.1677
22. Bi LX, Simmons DJ, Hawkins HK et al. Comparative morphology of the marrow sac. Anat Rec. 2000;260(4):410-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0185(20001201)260:4<410::AID-AR110>3.0.CO;2-Z
23. Lyu M, Xu D, Zhang X, Yuan Q. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a review of current evidence on anatomical factors and a decision tree. Int J Oral Sci. 2023;15(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-023-00248-x
24. Monje A, Diaz KT, Aranda L et al. Schneiderian Membrane Thickness and Clinical Implications for Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analyses. J Periodontol. 2016;87(8):888-899. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160041
Supplementary files
The results of the study allow us to consider the mucous membrane and periosteum of the wall of the anterior maxillary sinus as a unified structural and functional complex
Review
For citations:
Volov N.V., Grigorieva Yu.V., Yukhimets S.N., Nefyodova I.F. FEATURES OF THE STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION AND INTERTISSUE INTERACTIONS OF THE MAXILLARY SINUS ANTERIOR WALL MUCOUS MEMBRANE AND ITS PERIOSTEUM. Morphological newsletter. 2024;32(1):ID-857. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2024.32(1).857