THE SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF HUMAN FOOT METATARSAL BONES ANATOMICAL VARIABILITY STUDIES
https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2025.33(2).960
Abstract
In the scientific and practical aspect, the significance of the osteological and osteometry studies results in the field of identification of skeletal remains and identification of individuals in general is difficult to overestimate, despite the corresponding achievements of modern molecular and genetic methods. However, the labor intensity, cost and accuracy of the latter still leave much to be desired, and the effectiveness does not exceed the effectiveness of classical methods of forensic and archaeological diagnostics, therefore osteometry, both direct and X-ray, remains the «gold standard» for identifying bone elements of the human skeleton. The purpose of the study is to summarize the available data of domestic and foreign scientific literature on the quantitative anatomical variability of human metatarsal bones according to direct and indirect X-ray osteometry and its scientific and practical significance. The material for the study was foreign and domestic literature sources from 1983 to 2025. The inclusion criterion for the study was the presence of sources in certified databases, their indexing in domestic and world bibliographic databases of scientific data. The sources were selected by the following keywords: foot skeleton, metatarsu6, metatarsal bones, foot, human foot bones, osteometry, x-ray osteometry, foot computed tomography and some others. A total of 66 sources were selected. A descriptive method of analysis was used. Modern data on comparative anatomical features of variability of the foot skeleton and metapodia of humans and hominids are summarized. It is proven that anatomical variability of both direct and x-ray osteometry indices of the metatarsal bones of the human foot plays a significant role in the sex, age, height, and in some cases ethnic and racial characteristics identifying. The research results obtained in recent decades, in addition to their application for bio-identification in anthropology and forensic medicine, can be used to develop normal indicators necessary for the diagnosis of various diseases and conditions, as well as for planning surgical interventions and creating individualized orthopedic products.
About the Author
Yana I. ZerkalovaRussian Federation
Aspirantin, General and Clinical Morphology Department Senior Lecturer
Competing Interests:
The Author declares that she did have no conflicts of interest in planning, implementing, financing and using the results of this study
References
1. Ryakhovskiy MA, Khayrullin RM, Ermolenko AS, Mitchenko IV. Vozrastnaya dinamika morfometricheskikh pokazateley kostey stopy cheloveka po dannym rentgenoosteometrii. Rossiyskiy mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik imeni akademika I.P. Pavlova. 2009;17(2):8-15. In Russian
2. Khayrullin PM, Ryakhovskiy MA, Ermolenko AS, Akhmetova GR. Morfologiya trubchatykh kostey stopy cheloveka po dannym rentgenologicheskikh issledovaniy. Morfologiya. 2009;136(4):145-146. In Russian
3. Mel'nikov AA, Safiullina AF, Bayroshevskaya MV, Khayrullin RM. Osteometricheskie pokazateli kostnykh elementov stopy sovremennogo cheloveka/ V sb.: Problemy sovremennoy morfologii cheloveka. Mater. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashch. 80-letiyu prof. B.A. Nikityuka. Moskva: RGUFK, 2013.- S. 86-88. In Russian
4. Khayrullin RM, Safiullina AF, Nikiforov RV, Melnikov AA, Bayroshevskaya MV. Osteometric and physical variability of the human foot bones. Revista Argentina de Anatomía Clínica. 2013;5(2):124-124
5. Khayrullin RM, Mel'nikov AA, Khayrullin FR, Nikiforov RV. Osteometricheskie indeksy srednikh falang stopy cheloveka i ikh polovye razlichiya. Morfologicheskie vedomosti. 2014;3:66-73. In Russian
6. Mel'nikov AA, Nikiforov RV, Khayrullin RM, Khayrullin FR. Osteometricheskie parametry srednikh falang stopy cheloveka i ikh polovye razlichiya. Morfologicheskie vedomosti. 2014;1:70-78. In Russian
7. Mel'nikov AA, Khayrullin RM, Safiullina AF, Khayrullin FR. Diskriminantnyj analiz pal'tsevoy i polovoy izmenchivosti osteometricheskikh pokazateley srednikh falang stopy cheloveka. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2014;10-4:693-699. In Russian
8. Bayroshevskaya MV, Safiullina AF, Khayrullin RM. Chastota tipov pyatochnoy kosti po modifitsirovannoy klassifi-katsii form tarannykh sustavnykh poverkhnostey. Morfologicheskie vedomosti. 2014;1:26-32. In Russian
9. Bayroshevskaya MV, Safiullina AF, Khayrullin RM, Nikiforov RV. Polovye razlichiya pyatochnykh kostey stopy cheloveka po dannym pryamoy osteometrii. Morfologicheskie vedomosti. 2014;3:31-36. In Russian
10. Bezrukova OD, Safiullina AF, Nikiforov RV et al. Osteometric sex differences of foot bones are concentrated on the proximal-distal axis and on 2th and 4th rays/ V kn.: The 6th International Symposium of Clinical and Applied Anatomy. 2014. S. 73-74
11. Ermolenko AS, Ryakhovskiy MA, Khayrullin RM. Bilateral'naya izmenchivost' rentgenoosteometricheskikh pokazateley pyastnykh kostey kisti cheloveka. Saratovskiy nauchno-meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2009;5(3):313-315. In Russian
12. Ermolenko AS, Ryakhovskiy MA, Khayrullin RM. Sravnitel'noe issledovanie izmenchivosti rentgenoosteometricheskikh pokazateley pyastnykh kostey v zavisimosti ot klimato-geograficheskogo faktora. Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy. 2009;16(1):175-176. In Russian
13. Ermolenko AS, Khayrullin FR, Khayrullin RM. Znacheniya chisel Fibonachchi v sootnosheniyakh kostnykh segmentov kisti cheloveka. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2011;9-2:241-244. In Russian
14. Ermolenko AS, Khayrullin RM. Zakonomernosti bilateral'noy organizatsii dliny falang kisti cheloveka. Uchenye zapiski SPbGMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova. 2011;18(2):55-56. In Russian
15. Khayrullin RM, Fomina AV, Aynullova NK. Variabel'nost' znacheniy 2d:4d pal'tsevogo indeksa u dikikh i laboratornykh zhivotnykh. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2013;6-3:611-618. In Russian
16. Khayrullin RM. Sootnoshenie morfologicheskoy i funktsional'noy asimmetrii kisti u cheloveka. Morfologiya. 2001;120(4):88. In Russian
17. Khayrullin RM. Morfologicheskie tipy kisti v yunosheskom periode individual'nogo razvitiya. Morfologicheskie vedomosti. 2001;1-2:103-105. In Russian
18. Khayrullin RM. Effektivnost' indeksov fluktuiruyushchey asimmetrii dlya otsenki morfologicheskikh priznakov cheloveka. Morfologicheskie vedomosti. 2002;1-2:52-54. In Russian
19. Filippova EN, Khayrullin RM. Individual'naya izmenchivost' morfometricheskikh parametrov pal'tsevykh dermatoglifov kisti. Morfologiya. 2001;120(4):87-88. In Russian
20. D Gonçalves D, Thompson TJU, Cunha E. Osteometric sex determination of burned human skeletal remains. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(7):906-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.07.003
21. Rösing FW, Graw M, Marré B et al. Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons. HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology. 2007;58(1):75-89
22. Pigolkin YuI, Zolotenkova GV, Berezovskiy DP. Metodologicheskie osnovy opredeleniya vozrasta cheloveka. Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertiza. 2020;63(3);45-50. In Russian
23. Zvyagin VN, Eremenko AE. Diagnostika massivnosti skeleta i somatotipa cheloveka po kostyam stopy. Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertiza. 2003;46(3):17-23. In Russian
24. Sveshnikov KA. Gendernye razlichiya massy mineral'nykh veshchestv v kostyakh skeleta v vozrastnom aspekte. Fundamental'-nye issledovaniya. 2012;5(1):110-114. In Russian
25. Ying-chun MI, Rui-xing G. The X-Ray and CT Diagnosis of 21 with Metatarsal Tarsal Bone Fracture Research. Image Technology. 2013;27-28. URL:https://caod.oriprobe.com/articles/40609751/The_X_Ray_and_CT_Diagnosis_of_21_with_Metatarsal_T.htm?__cf_chl_rt_tk=dAN0TdI9x18z9jXH3X2w.Te3Kmh73Tg2PWBilHilqoM-1751442357-1.0.1.1-QHlSZNI6J79xIK.ojDKRdsp5VBjEQFiuau_plrVYSbQ. Viewing date 02.07.2025
26. Nikityuk BA. Akseleratsiya razvitiya detey i ee posledstviya. - Alma-Ata: Kazakhstan, 1990.- 176s. In Russian
27. Hiteshkumar MC, Taqi M. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Arches of the Foot. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing LLC, 2025. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK587361/ Viewing date 02.07.2025
28. McFadden D, Bracht MS. Sex differences in the relative lengths of metacarpals and metatarsals in gorillas and chimpanzees. Horm Behav. 2005;47:99-111
29. McFadden D, Bracht MS. The relative lengths and weights of metacarpals and metatarsals in baboons (papio hamadryas). Horm Behav. 2003;43:347-355
30. Marchi D. The cross-sectional geometry of the hand and foot bones of the hominoidea and its relationship to locomotor behavior. J Hum Evo. 2005;49(6);743-761
31. Zipfel B, Kidd R. Hominin first metatarsals (SKX 5017 and SK 1813) from Swartkrans: a morphometric analysis. Homo. 2006;57:117-131
32. Higurashi Y et al. Integrative experimental and morphological study of the metacarpal and metatarsal bones of the Japanese macaque. Anthropological Science. 2019;127(2):123–130
33. Sineva IM. Opredelenie polovoy prinadlezhnosti v paleoantropologicheskikh issledovaniyakh kostey verkhney i nizhney konechnosti». Avtoref. diss. na soisk. uch. st. kand. biol. nauk. M.: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 2013.- 16 s. In Russian
34. Mountrakis C, Eliopoulos C, Koilias CG, Manolis SK. Sex determination using metatarsal osteometrics from the Athens collection. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;200:1-7
35. Hyer CF et al. The obliquity of the first metatarsal base. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:728-732
36. McFadden D, Bracht MS. Sex and Race Differences in the Relative Lengths of Metacarpals and Metatarsals in Human Skeletons. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(2):117–124
37. Robling AG, Ubelaker DH. Sex estimation from the metatarsals. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1997;42(6):1062–1069
38. Aarti RG, Srinivas M. Determination of Sex by Osteometry of Third Metatarsal. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 2020;14:3-10
39. Torres G, Garmendia AM, Sánchez-Mejorada G, Gómez-Valdés JA. Estimation of gender from metacarpals and metatarsals in a Mexican population. Rev Esp Med Legal. 2020;46(1):12-19
40. Bidmos MA et al. Estimation of sex from metatarsals using discriminant function and logistic regression analyses. AJFS. 2019;10:10-18
41. Case DT, Ross AH. Sex determination from hand and foot bone lengths. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2007;52(2):264-270
42. Cordeiro C et al. Predicting adult stature from metatarsal length in a Portuguese population. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;193(1-3):e1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.017
43. De Grootel I, Humphrey LT. Body Mass and Stature Estimation Based on the First Metatarsal in Humans. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011;144(4):625-632
44. Bidmos MA. Metatarsals in the estimation of stature in South Africans. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2008;15(8):505-509
45. Park JH et al. Estimating Adult Stature Using Metatarsal Length in the Korean Population: A Cadaveric Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;16;19(22):15124. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215124
46. Byers S, Akoshima K, Curran B. Determining the height of an adult by the length of the metatarsal bones. Am J Physical Anthropol. 1989;79(3):275-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330790303.989;275-279
47. Pablos A et al. From toe to head: use of robust regression methods in stature estimation based on foot remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;226(1-3):299.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.01.009
48. Krishan K. Determination of stature from foot and its segments in a north Indian population. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008;29(4):297-303
49. Zeybek G, Ergur I, Demiroglu Z. Stature and gender estimation using foot measurements. Forensic Sci. Int. 2008;181(1-3):54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.08.003
50. Ozden H et al. Stature and sex estimate using foot and shoe dimensions. Forensic Science International. 2005;147(2-3):181-184
51. Munisami B, Santanagopalan M. Identification of the second, third and fourth metatarsal bones of man. The Anatomical Record. 1983;207(3):509-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092070312
52. Minor J-M L, Winter M. The intermetatarsal articular facet of the first metatarsal bone in humans: a derived trait unique with primates. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2003;185(4):359-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-9602(03)80061-4
53. Kazuhiro S. Population Differences in the Appearance of the Intermetatarsal Articular Facet of the First Metatarsal Bone. Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. 2007;33:1–8
54. Hardy RH, Clapham JCR. Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1951;33(3):376–391. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.33B3.376
55. Dominguez-Maldonado G et al. Normal values of metatarsal parabola arch in male and female feet. Scientific World Journal. 2014:505736. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/505736
56. Grande-Del-Arco J et al. Radiographic Analysis on the Distortion of the Anatomy of First Metatarsal Head in Dorsoplantar Projection. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(8):552. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10080552
57. Gawlikowska A et al. X-ray evaluation of symmetry development of human metatarsal bones in different periods of fetal life. Med Sci Monit. 2007;13(6):131-135
58. De Vasconcellos HA, Mandarim-De-Lacerda CA. Human metatarsal growth: an allometrical analysis in prenatal period. Arch Ital Anat Embriol. 1988;93(3):155-62
59. De Vasconcellos HA, Prates JC, Moraes LG, Rodriques HC. Growth of the human metatarsal bones in the fetal period (13-24 weeks postconception): a quantitative study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1992;14(4):315-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01794757
60. De Vasconcellos HA, Ferreira E. Metatarsal growth during the second trimester: a predictor of gestational age? 1998;193(1):145-149. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19310145.x
61. Senol D et al. Sex prediction with morphometric measurements of first and fifth metatarsal and phalanx obtained from X-ray images by using machine learning algorithms. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2023;82(3):704-711. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2022.0052
62. Akhlaghi M et al. Sex determination from metatarsals in Iranian population. IJMTFM. 2017;7(4):203-208
63. Moneim AWM. et al. Identification of sex depending on radiological examination of foot and patella. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008;29:136-140
64. Rodrıguez S et al. Estimating adult stature from radiographically determined metatarsal length in a Spanish population. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;226(1-3):297.e1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.12.006
65. Ezhov MYu. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie degenerativno-distroficheskikh zabolevaniy sustavov stopy i golenostopnogo sustava. Avtoref. diss. na soisk. uch. st. dokt. med. nauk.- Nizhniy Novgorod, 2013.- 39s. In Russian
66. Zgonis T et al. The value of radiographic parameters in the surgical treatment of hallux rigidus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44(3):184-189
In accordance with the data available in the scientific anatomical and anthropological sources, it is proven that the anatomical variability of human foot metatarsal bones both direct and X-ray osteometry indicators plays a significant role in the sex, age, height, and in some cases ethnic and racial characteristics identifying
Review
For citations:
Zerkalova Ya.I. THE SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF HUMAN FOOT METATARSAL BONES ANATOMICAL VARIABILITY STUDIES. Morphological newsletter. 2025;33(2):id-960 Cтатья опубликована / The Article is published. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2025.33(2).960