SPATIAL POSITION OF THE SPHENOIDAL YOKE OF THE SPHENOID BONE IN ADULT PEOPLE ON DEPENDING OF THE TYPE OF THE SKULL

Information about the typical stereotopic variability of the sphenoidal yoke of the sphenoid bone is necessary to expand the scientific and technical capabilities in neurosurgery. The aim of the study was to study the stereotopic variability of the sphenoidal yoke of the sphenoid bone in adults, depending on the type of base of the skull. By stereotopometry on 100 passported turtles of people of mature age (21-60 years old) from the collection of the Fundamental Museum of the Department of Human Anatomy Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, the value of the basilar angle is determined and the types of its base are highlighted; we studied the spatial coordinates of standard craniometric points (nasion, sellar, basion) and non-standard craniometric points: the front and rear edges of the sphenoidal yoke on the right and left, according to the distance of their projections to three mutually perpendicular planes: sagittal, frontal and Frankfurt. The typical variability of the spatial position of the sphenoidal yoke was established: in flexibasilar types of the skull – yoke occupies a higher spatial position relative to the Frankfurt plane, close to the front and both its edges are equally distant from the sagittal plane, compared with the level of platibasilar type. The height of the sphenoidal yoke of the mediobasilar type relative to the Frankfurt plane corresponds to the level of flexibasilar, relative to the frontal plane - it occupies a middle position between the parameters of the extreme types of the base of the skull, relative to the sagittal plane - its front edge occupies the same position as the extreme types, while the location of its posterior edge corresponds to the level of the plate-basilar type.

sphenoidal yoke, sphenoid bone, basilar angle, type of skull

1. Gajvoronskij IV, Yakovleva AA. Variantnaya anatomiya i morfometricheskie harakteristiki klinovidnoj kosti vzroslogo cheloveka. Vestnik Rossijskoj voenno-medicinskoj akademii. 2011;3(35):146-150.

2. Tastanbekov MM. Klinika, diagnostika i hirurgicheskoe lechenie meningiom ploshhadki klinovidnoj kosti. Avtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 1996. 23s.

3. Sharipov OI, Kutin OI, Polev GA, Kalinin PL. Lateral'nyj rasshirennyj transsfenoidal'nyj jendoskopicheskij dostup cherez krylovidno-nebnuju jamku v hirurgii meningojencefalocele bokovogo karmana klinovidnoj kosti. Zhurnal «Voprosy nejrohirurgii» im. N.N. Burdenko. 2018;82(5):96-103.

4. Konovalov AN, Cherekaev VA, Kozlov AV. Hirurgija opuholej osnovanija cherepa. Moskva: Antidor, 2004. S. 372.

5. Aleshkina OYu, Nikolenko VN. Bazikranial'naya tipologiya konstrukcii cherepa cheloveka. Moskva: Izd. Pervyj MGMU im. I.M. Sechenova, 2014. S. 160.

6. Speranskij BC. Osnovy medicinskoj kraniologii. Moskva: Medicina, 1988. S. 288.

7. Cavallo L, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F, Divitiis E, Gardner P, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg. Focus. 2005;19(1):1-14.

8. Aleshkina OYu, Nikolenko VN, Hurchak YUA, Anisimov AN, Bikbaeva TS, Polkovova IA. Izmenchivost' linejnyh parametrov cherepnyh yamok vnutrennego osnovaniya cherepa v zavisimosti ot kraniotipa. Morfologiya. 2018;153(3):16.

9. Andredaki M, Koumantanou A, Dorotheouand D, Halazonetis D. A cephalometric morphometric study of the sella turcica. European Jof Orthodontics. 2007;(29):449–456. DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjm048.

10. Yakovleva AA. Variantnaya anatomiya klinovidnoj kosti vzroslogo cheloveka i vozmozhnosti prizhiznennyh metodov ee vizualizacii. Avtoref. diss. kand. med. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 2014. S. 20.

11. Aleshkina OYu, Markeeva MV, Mareev OV, Bikbaeva TS, Polkovova I.A. Morfostereotopometricheskaya izmenchivost' i prostranstvennoe raspolozhenie struktur reshetchatoj kosti u vzroslyh lyudej. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Medicinskie nauki. 2017;3(43):5-12. DOI: 10.21685/2072-3032-2017-3-1.

12. Polkovova IA, Aleshkina OYu, Nikolenko VN, Chernyshkova EV, Bikbaeva TS. Tipovaya izmenchivost' krylovidno-verhnechelyustnoj shcheli v zavisimosti ot formy licevogo cherepa. Morfologicheskie Vedomosti – Morphological Newsletter. 2017;25(2):57-59.

13. Gajvoronskij AV, Gajvoronskij IV, Gajvoronskij AI, Pazhinskij LV. Variantnaja anatomija reshetchatogo labirinta i klinovidnoj pazuhi. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2007;11(1):86–89.

14. Alekseev VP, Debec GF. Kraniometriya. Metodika antropologicheskih issledovanij. Moskva: Nauka, 1964. S. 128.

15. Speranskij VS, Zajchenko AI. Forma i konstrukcija cherepa. Moskva: Medicina, 1980. S. 280.

16. Majkova-Stroganova VS, Rohlin DG. Kosti i sustavy v rentgenovskom izobrazhenii. Golova. Moskva: Medgiz, 1955. S. 476.

17. Baklanovoj VF, Filippkina MA. Rentgenodiagnostika v pediatrii: rukovodstvo dlja vrachej. Moskva: Medicina, 1988. S. 366.

18. Shcherbinin AV, Gulyaev DA. Ob"em rezekcii osnovaniya cherepa pri transbazal'nom dostupe s ychetom dannyh hirurgicheskoj anatomii perednej cherepnoj yamki. Materialy SH s"ezda nejrohirurgov Rossii. Sankt-Peterburg, 2002:179.