AGED DYNAMICS OF THE ANATOMОMETRY PARAMETERS OF THE PROSTATE GLAND AND ITS TOPOGRAPHY WITH BENIGN HYPERPLASIA ACCORDING TO MAGNETIC RESONANCE TOMOGRAPHY

The study and analysis of intravital magnetic resonance imaging is relevant both from a theoretical and practical point of view as a supplement to the available data on the clinical anatomy of the male pelvis for radiologists and urologists. Purpose of the study: to obtain new data on intravital anatomy and topography of the prostate gland in conditions of its benign hyperplasia according to magnetic resonance imaging. The data of magnetic resonance imaging of 195 urological patients were studied and interpreted, including 100 patients with signs of benign prostatic hyperplasia and 95 patients without it. Linear dimensions were assessed in three orthogonal planes - sagittal, frontal and transverse, the volume of the prostate gland, the distance from it to the bone structures of the pelvis, the area of ​​​​adjacency of the prostate gland to the bladder and the extent of adherence to the rectum. It was revealed that the frequency of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia increases with age, in the 1^st period of adulthood it is 18,2%, in the 2^nd mature age period – 46,7%, in the elderly – 81,8%, in old age - 100%. The size and volume of the prostate in such patients also increase with age: in the 1^st period of adulthood, the average prostate volume is 30,1 cm³ versus 23,1 cm³ in other patients, in the 2^nd period - 41 cm³ versus 26,0 cm³, in the elderly – 58,1 cm³ versus 23,3 cm³ (respectively), in old age – 108,6 cm³. There is a decrease in the distance from the prostate to the bone structures of the pelvis with age, a closer location of its base to the plane of the entrance to the small pelvis. With benign prostatic hyperplasia, there is also an increase in the area of ​​​​adjacency of the prostate gland to the bladder and the length of adherence to the rectum. The presented results can be used in the diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia in males of the first and second age groups.

1. Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL. The Development of Human Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Age. The Journal of Urology. 1984;132(3):474–479. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49698-4

2. Gorilovskiy LM. Zabolevanija predstatel'noj zhelezy v pozhilom vozraste. Moskva: Medpraktika, 1999.- 120s. In Russian

3. Zolotukhin OV. Aktual'nye voprosy diagnostiki i lecheniya dobrokachestvennoy giperplazii predstatel'noy zhelezy: monografiya. Voronezh, 2016.- 135s. In Russian

4. Kuz'menko VV, Kuz'menko AB, Zolotukhin OV. Sovremennye aspekty v diagnostike i lechenii DGPZh: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Voronezh, 2011.- 82s. In Russian. URL: http://diss.seluk.ru/m-meditsina/787988-1-institut-dopolnitelnogo-professionalnogo-obrazovaniya-kafedra-urologii-andrologii-idpo-sovremennie-aspekti-diagnostike-lechenii.php

5. Torp-Pedersen S, Juul N, Jakobsen H. Transrectal prostatic ultrasonography. Equipment, normal findings, benign hyperplasia and cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988;107:19-25

6. Bo M, Ventura M, Marinello R et al. Relationship between Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA) and volume of the benign prostatic hyperplasia in the elderly. Crit. Rev. Oncol Hematol. 2003. Sep;47(3): 07-11. DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(03)00094-5

7. McNeal JE. The anatomic heterogeneity of the prostate. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1980;37:149-60

8. Shaish H, Taneja SS, Rosenkrantz AB. Prostate MR Imaging: An Update. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;55(2):303-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2016.10.011

9. Allen KS, Kressel HY, Arger PH, Pollack HM. Age-related changes of the prostate: evaluation by MRI image. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1989. Jan;152(1);77-81. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.1.77

10. McNeal JE. The prostate gland: morphology and pathobiology. Monogr. Urology. 1983;4:3–37

11. Price H, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Evolving patterns of tissue composition in benign prostatic hyperplasia as a function of specimen size. Hum Pathol. 1990 Jun;21(6):578-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90002-7

12. Marks LS, Treiger B, Dorey FJ et al. Morphometry of the prostate: I. Distribution of tissue components in hyperplastic glands. Urology. 1994 Oct;44(4):486-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80044-8

13. Bangma CH, Niemer AQ, Grobbee DE, Schröder FH. Transrectal ultrasonic volumetry of the prostate: in vivo comparison of different methods. Prostate. 1996 Feb;28(2):107-10. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(199602)28:2%3C107::aid-pros5%3E3.0.co;2-d

14. Lee JH, Lee SW. Impact of prostate volume on erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Aging Male. 2016;19:106–10. DOI: 10.3109/13685538.2016.1150993

15. Wasserman NF, Niendorf E, Spilseth B. Measurement of Prostate Volume with MRI (A Guide for the Perplexed): Biproximate Method with Analysis of Precision and Accuracy. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 17;10(1):575. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57046-x

16. Gayvoronskiy IV, Vinogradov SV. Sravnitel'naya kharakteristika anatomicheskikh i prizhiznennykh issledovaniy anatomo-topograficheskikh vzaimootnosheniy organov malogo taza vzroslogo cheloveka. Trudy Voenno-meditsinskoy akademii Sankt-Peterburga. 2004;256:83-95. In Russian

17. Khnykin FN. Topografo-anatomicheskie osobennosti prostaty i ee ekstraorgannykh sosudov u vzroslogo cheloveka : avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata meditsinskikh nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 2005.- 23s. In Russian

18. Kosourov AK, Rokhlin GD, Blagova IA. Vozmozhnosti magnitno-rezonansnoy tomografii v morfologicheskikh issledovaniyakh. Morfologiya. 1999;115(2):59-65. In Russian

19. Alyaev YuG, Sinitsyn VE, Grigor'ev NA. Magnitno-rezonansnaya tomografiya v urologii. Moskva, 2005.- 272s. In Russian

20. Rinkk Peter A. Magnitny rezonans v meditsine: osnovnoy uchebnik Evropeyskogo foruma po magnitnomu rezonansu; per. s angl. DV Ustyuzhanina; pod red. VE Sinitsyna. Moskva, 2003.- 247s. In Russian

21. Trufanov GE. Magnitno-rezonansnaya tomografiya: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. Sankt-Peterburg, 2007.- 688s. In Russian